Solver
T 0.15 · left-brainWaiting for assignment…
Privacy-first multi-agent validation
Nexus is the Critique Room — a privacy-first validation platform where multiple agents solve, critique, score, and agree before anything reaches you. On hardware you control.
Individual $99 · Professional $249 · Team $499 · Enterprise private nodes
Critique Room
CR-1842Session brief
Is this outbound wire — $184,200 to a new beneficiary — synthetic-identity fraud?
Waiting for assignment…
Waiting for assignment…
Waiting for assignment…
Consensus
Forming…
Score
—
Abort gate
armed
Minority
—
Open-weight first
Hardware-aware routing
Air-gap ready
Abort gates on every session
Minority reports preserved
The gap
Single-model systems speak with confidence and skip the argument. When the cost of error is high — risk, compliance, legal, fraud, safety-critical engineering — that is a structural failure, not a prompt-engineering problem.
Fluent, confident, and frequently wrong. The review cycle still lives in a human's inbox.
Frontier APIs take the work off-prem. Token bills and model drift come with it.
Multi-agent stacks without pre-flight caps and abort gates will spend you into a corner.
Product
Nexus Intelligence Platform is a deterministic orchestration engine — not a chatbot wrapper. The Critique Room is the product surface.
Multiple agents solve, critique, score, and seek consensus before any answer is returned. Disagreement is a first-class surface, not a hidden average.
Local and open-weight inference by default. Air-gap and customer-controlled keys from day one — not a later migration.
The PAL queries VRAM and compute before assignment. Work stays on the node that can actually run it.
Pre-flight cost math, token caps, and programmatic abort gates. Multi-agent sessions do not get to surprise you.
Raw thought traces, scores, and minority reports stream separately from the final answer. Replayable. Defensible.
Models are interchangeable behind the PAL. The product is the validation system, not a single frontier API.
How it works
01
Capability tags meet available hardware. Simple work stays cheap. Sensitive work stays local.
02
A single optimized model goes first. Most sessions never need a committee.
03
If the QC score falls below rubric, the Critique Room opens. Solver, critic, and verifier go to work.
04
Consensus, scores, and the trail — or an abort under policy. Never a black-box average.
Architecture
Local inference by default. Private networking. No training on your content without a contract. Customer-managed keys where required. Fully air-gapped when the work demands it.
Customer-controlled keys
You hold policy. We do not become the intelligence layer.
Nexus Shield
Fraud and anomaly vertical — same Critique Room, specialized rubrics.
State externalized
Checkpoints in PostgreSQL. Sessions survive disconnects. RAM holds nothing durable.
Pricing
Entry low enough to try. Headroom for enterprise when cost-of-error is quantifiable. Usage overages exist; the primary motion is a predictable subscription.
$99per month
Power users who need a private Critique Room without procurement.
$249per month
Serious individual workflows. Custom agents and conversation history.
$499per month
Small groups sharing a validation layer on high-pain workflows.
$15k–$75kannual ACV
Private or self-hosted. SSO, custom models, SLA, white-label path.
Voices
Composite discovery quotes. Nexus is pre-revenue — we will not invent logos to look further along.
“I don't need another fluent model. I need to show the board why an answer survived challenge — and keep the filings inside our perimeter.”
“I already run Ollama. What I don't have is a room where three models have to agree before I ship the code review.”
“If the system hides disagreement, I can't defend it to audit. Visible minority reports are the feature, not a nice-to-have.”
Questions
Single-model fluency is not systematic critique, scoring, consensus, or an audit trail. For work where a wrong answer is expensive, the validation layer is the product — not the model.
No. We collect only what is required to run the service. Training on customer content requires an explicit agreement. Minimal collection is a product feature.
Yes. Architecture supports customer-chosen regions, private nodes, and air-gapped deployments. Early customers with strict residency run the node in their geography.
Hardware-aware routing and the Critique Room itself. Quality-sensitive tasks can use a stronger model — including a customer-supplied key — and still pass through the same critique layer.
Founding access
Year-one target is fifty paying accounts — Individual, Professional, and early Team seats. Enterprise is a design-partner motion, not the volume engine. Join the list and we'll open seats as the Critique Room hardens.
No spam. We'll only write when there is a seat or a private deploy conversation worth having.